Platelet reactivity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a comparative analysis with survivors of myocardial infarction and the role of glycaemic control.

UNLABELLED: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus exhibit considerable platelet dysfunction, though this is poorly characterized in patients with diabetes taking aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events. We sought to compare platelet function in this patient population with that of a high-risk group of non-diabetic subjects with a history of previous myocardial infarction (MI), and to assess whether glycaemic control impacts on platelet function. METHODS: Platelet aggregation was measured in response to incremental concentrations of five platelet agonists using light transmission aggregometry. All patients were taking aspirin, and aspirin insensitivity was defined as ≥ 20% arachidonic acid (AA) mediated aggregation. Patients with diabetes were divided according to glycaemic control (HbA(1c)): optimal ≤ 6.5, good 6.6-7.4 and suboptimal ≥ 7.5%. RESULTS: In total, 85 patients with type 2 diabetes and 35 non-diabetic patients with previous MI were recruited. Compared to MI patients, diabetes patients had increased aggregation in response to multiple concentrations of epinephrine, collagen, adenosine diphosphate and AA. Aspirin insensitivity was more common in type 2 diabetes (15% vs. 0%, p=0.037). Platelet aggregation was increased in response to several agonists patients with suboptimal glycaemic control compared to patients with optimal control. Aspirin insensitivity was also more common in patients with suboptimal glycaemic control compared to those with good or optimal control (26.0% vs. 8.3% vs. 4%, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, without proven vascular disease, exhibit platelet dysfunction and have increased platelet aggregation and aspirin insensitivity compared to non-diabetic patients with previous MI. Platelet dysfunction in diabetes is more severe in patients with suboptimal glycaemic control.

Dual antiplatelet therapy unmasks distinct platelet reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Platelet-induced thrombosis is a major risk factor for recurrent ischemic events, although platelet function in patients with cardiovascular disease taking aspirin and clopidogrel is very poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to assess platelet reactivity in patients with cardiovascular disease taking aspirin and clopidogrel. METHODS: We developed a rapid assay to measure platelet aggregation in response to arachidonic acid, collagen, adenosine diphosphate (ADP), epinephrine and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) in 80 healthy volunteers. We then recruited 200 consecutive patients from outpatient clinics and the cardiac catheterization laboratory and tested platelet function. Platelet aggregation induced by epinephrine is a marker of global platelet reactivity. We tested platelet function in 146 patients compliant with antiplatelet therapy. Platelet aggregation to epinephrine was divided into quartiles. The platelet response to the other agonists was analysed based on the response to epinephrine. RESULTS: Platelet reactivity increased significantly across the quartiles in response to epinephrine in healthy volunteers and patients (P < 0.0001). A significant increase in response across quartiles was seen with all agonists in healthy volunteers (P < 0.001). In contrast, a significant increase in response across quartiles was only seen with ADP in patients (P < 0.0001). Hypertension, smoking and diabetes were significantly associated with increasing platelet reactivity to epinephrine (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that platelet response differs between healthy volunteers and patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. In patients with cardiovascular disease, dual antiplatelet therapy unmasks a distinct type of platelet reactivity in response to epinephrine and ADP but not other agonists.